Liebe Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter,
herzlichen Dank für Eure Teilnahme an dem Projekttag heute. Ich habe mir das Projekt „Grundausstattung für Flüchtlinge und Migranten“ nun drei Wochen lang angeschaut und möchte meine Beobachtungen mit Euch teilen und angehen. Das soll Eure Erfahrungen einbringen sowie neue Dynamiken und Möglichkeiten schaffen. Denn zu Entscheidungen wird es heute nicht kommen – wir können immer nur überlegen, abwägen und ausprobieren. Und der Geschäftsführung unsere Ansichten kund tun.
Das hiesige Projekt „Grundausstattung für Flüchtlinge und Migranten“ läuft seit zwei Jahren und soll noch bis 2024 laufen. Es lässt sich in zwei Teile aufteilen, nämlich einerseits die Kleiderkammer, wie Ihr sie in gewohnter Routine für bedürftige Menschen betreibt. Darüber hinaus soll dieses Projekt einen Schwerpunkt auf Neuankömmlinge legen und mit Partnern vom LAGeSo, Grundsicherungsamt, Gesundheitsamt, Caritas, dem Roten Kreuz sowie den Flüchtlingsunterkünften, um die spezifische Bedarfe der Neuankömmlinge zu ermitteln, sie entsprechend auszurüsten und zu unterstützen.
Um diesem Schwerpunkt des Projekts gerecht zu werden, werden wir gewisse Änderungen in der hiesigen Arbeitsweise vornehmen müssen. Persönlich denke ich, dass das Optimum wäre, wenn die Mohriner Allee mit ihrer großen Fläche und überschaubarem Publikumsverkehr dafür ausgerüstet würde, als Verteilerzentrum fungieren würde, sowohl für unsere beiden Kleiderkammern in Tempelhof-Schöneberg als auch für mögliche Kooperationsvereinbarungen mit Flüchtlingsunterkünften. Des weiteren könnte ich mir vorstellen, dass wir regelmäßig Flüchtlingsunterkünfte und -lager säckeweise beliefern, oder monatliche Flohmärkte dort, vor Ort abhalten.
Wie gesagt, das sind unausgegorene Überlegungen und ich bin Euch dankbar für Euer Input, wie diese Ziele umsetzbar sind bzw. welche Hürden auf dem Weg dorthin zu nehmen sind. In meiner Erfahrung als Projektmanager ist nämlich ein guter (ordentlicher, konsequenter, ausführlicher) Plan schon die halbe Umsetzung.
Doch eines wäre noch wichtig mitzunehmen: Mit der Zurverfügungstellung und Verteilung von Spenden können wir tatsächlich einen Beitrag zum Umweltschutz leisten, wie für das Projekt vorgesehen. Nämlich indem wir den Anteil an wiederverwendeter Kleidung gegenüber dem Ausschuss erhöhen. Auch deshalb wollen wir schauen, wie wir mehr Spenden an den Mann bzw. die Frau bringen, anstelle sie dem Verwerter (eigentlich: Entsorger) in den Fleischwolf zu werfen.
Behandlung des Aushangs: Wir nehmen keine Möbel an.
Für den Aushang spricht, dass wir keine Möbel annehmen und mögliche Spender das wissen lassen wollen. Dagegen spricht,
1. dass wir anscheinend schon Möbel (augenscheinlich alte Bürostühle) annehmen;
2. dass tendenziell niemand, der nicht vorher nachgefragt hat, aber trotzdem seine Möbel zur Entsorgung ins Auto gepackt hat, sich von diesem kleinen Schild davon abhalten lässt, seinen Schrott trotzdem dort abzuladen;
3. dass es das Fenster versaut
Ergebnis: Es werden keine Aushänge mehr mit Tesafilm am Fenster befestigt. Die Möglichkeit einer Aushang-Pinnwand wurden erörtert. Informationen für Mitarbeiter mögen direkt kommuniziert werden.
Was ich noch sagen wollte:
* Das Programm 16i ist ein Programm des Change Managements: Es erwartet Veränderung, Veränderung der persönliche Situation (z.B. Lernen ist auch eine Veränderung) und gesellschaftliches Verhalten.
6 Comments
James Seata
Photography has indefinitely dedicated a wonderful position in my marriage my hobby life. As a youngster someone could discover myself in hand with a thirty-five mm professional camera in my hand taking shots of my favorite childhood friends and family gatherings, and the beautiful scenery lending to the tiny coastal city in the north Virginia oceanside where my relatives and I went to grade school. This thing my dad taught me grew over time to a passionate skill which I followed, perusing newspaper pictures and outdoor photoshoots in the earlier part of my life. After, I instigated putting together a highly sought marketing career strategy where enigmatic nudges and character building energies started to manifest and be seen inside my body of work. Now I am forever a continually referenced and award winning Seattle Washington Wedding top Photographer and can be found in all about Washington as well as all of Washington.
Rodney Om
Du bist der Illusion erlegen, dass du wirksam seist, Dinge ändern würdest. Dabei bist du selbst nur ein Rädchen im Getriebe des nachhaltigen Untergangs.
Edward Pibly
Familie ist so ne Sache: Der eine hat gute Erinnerungen an seine Kindheit, die andere fühlt sich in der ihrer Rolle als Familienzugehörige bestätigt. Wieder ein Anderes tut das nicht.
Familie stellt die kleinste soziale und wirtschaftliche Einheit dar, steht damit jedoch auch im Konflikt oder Wettbewerb sowohl mit dem Individuum als auch übergeordneten Identitäten wie Beruf, Religionszugehörigkeit, Nationalität etc.
Dabei sollten sich diese Aspekte gegenseitig befördern. Patriarchale Strukturen zu vererben oder marktwirtschaftliche Prozesse einzuführen ist hingegen kontraproduktiv. Vielmehr diskreditieren sie die Familie weiter. [url=https://renewablesworldwide.org/category/in-the-news/][color=#000_url]Matt D’Agati[/color][/url]
Darrell Ensuh
Worum geht’s denn der „Community“?
Community of Practice…
Practice of Direct Democracy,
Aktionsgruppen #statt Plenum, Plenar, Plenata – plemplem
Interessen, Interessenvertretung, Artikulation…
Graham Freestone
The Centre for Experimental Ontology is going to sleep, maybe only for a short while, maybe forever. This concludes phase 2 of its existence.
Below you can find a rough summary of what this phase dealt with, where the CEO is now and where it might potentially go in the future —Gurdjieff has been pointing to some interesting correlates/directions.
1) Pre-ontology: The notion of a pre-ontology was not explore sufficiently but remains an ongoing concern. The central idea is whether it is cogent to conceive of a way in which existence can occur without an ontology excluding certain modes as possible. The emphasis of the thought is on conceiving of magickal phenomena as totally naturalised on a contiuum with all other phenomena.
2) Pneuminous Accretions: The pneuminous accretions remain at the heart of the general system. Materialised conceptuality (or at least the grammatical cogency of it) enables magick and completes philosophy in all directions.
3) Vector Field: Equally central to the system is the vector field. Meant in the sense of a ‚carrier‘, the ability of vectors to host the pneuminous accretions is the counterpart to the accretions that completes the magickal explanation (of philosophy). A vector that houses a concept and suits it is the ordinary usage of the same force that we call magick (we don’t call it magick but the same operation occurs). A vector hosting an accretion that it would not normally house will find influenced/altered on a magickal level (what we tend to mean when we say magick).
4) Different Occult Endgames: The Castaneda system highlights this already suspected possibility. The reality or metaphor of the assemblage point illustrates how there is no necessity to some kind of occult achievement (that could be considered final) over another. Even the notion of ‚freedom‘ in CC’s system can be contrasted against other possibilities of immortality. It is the extension of the lack of divine teleology into a vastly increased notion of what exists (which includes the occult possibilities).
5) Memetics: The disbanded science of memetics is highly commensurate with the pneuminous accretive theory. The only addition required is external existence of the memes i.e. whilst created by human activity they do no necessarily need it to continue to exist.
6) Susan Blackmore’s work present’s a considerable challenge to many aspects of esotericism. What she does is highlight the extreme ontology needed for it to be ‚real‘ and not purely psychological. Pneuminous accretive theory is a good fit for such an ontology however at least one additional caveat is needed. The notion in question is one of something like levels of reality or consciousness. This is something mentioned both in Castaneda and Gurdjieff. In Castaneda, Don Juan will say that ordinary people would literally not be able to see the anomalies, though they are perfectly real, likewise certain statements are unintelligible unless one has sufficient ‚power‘ to understand them. Gurdjieff says likewise that unless one obtains a certain level of consciousness, certain things are not visible and certain teachings incomprehensible. This is not a matter of cognitive ability but something else. This something else is what such an ontology would require, likewise it would say that the whole psychological edifice that Blackmore works in, amazingly admiral though it is to desire to not be fooled, can only return negative results, explainable in terms of neuroscience. This does not mean she has not encountered many frauds, but also it means that there is a certain letting go necessary for the actual encounter.
7) Plato, Castaneda, Laruelle: The most productive discussion in the last phase of the CEO concerned a kind of synthesis of these figures that overcomes that manifestation problem. The manifestation problem is simply this: if all ontologies (manifestations) compete equally to inhabit us, how do we understand an ontology that can account for this without lapsing into one more model. The pre-ontological investigations are related to this. Castaneda claims an absolute mode of perception that sees things as they are. This is the perception of the world as ‚energy‘, though this accretion (energy) itself contaminates this perception. The reduction of the allness of everything to an endless series of fibres of light was called the reticulum. Gurdjieff has a similar message though there is less mention of energetic perception, rather he talks of ‚objective perception‘, to again mean a perception of things as they are.
This line of thinking reinforces that what we mean by saying occult practices gives the completion of philosophy. To learn to perceive the pneuminous accretions as they are, to perceive the deep layers of the vector field. This possibility (?) undercuts Laruelle by granting access to the one, yet agreeing that philosophy (manifestations) is hopelessly inadequate to make any progress. The one is accessible only through deep struggle. This in turn makes sense of Plato but not as empty epistemology. The struggle out of the cave is a real struggle that we all must undertake and that necessarily most of cannot achieve -I include myself in this number.
But again this all relates to the point about ‚different occult endgames‘. What Castaneda and Gurdjieff talk about may well not be the same thing, furthermore there are many different stations in this realm. Gurdjieff talks about ‚right results‘ but maybe there are other kinds of ‚results‘.
8) The vector field does have a certain incoherence. It is the imagined perceptual residue devoid of concept (pneuminous accretion). Even if this is not cogent, the idea functions a) transcendentally as a necessary condition for the possibility of an object and b) as a heuristic by which we can understand the structure of things. This heuristic dimension is particularly relevant with regards to certain occult technologies. In Gurdjieff for instance, there is a technique related to self-remembering which involves dividing the psyche into a potential real ‚I‘ and the personality (often named after the person). The named being is the accreted (neurotic self or selves) and the real ‚I‘ is something that comes with the organism. It is this part that the esoteric practices seek to access. Does this division make great sense? Not particularly; the separation of the personality from a putative underlying ‚essence‘ is a highly confusing notion analytically. However as an occult instruction, or guidance, it has power. Conceive of yourself in this way and it helps to disclose pointless, repetitive, petty parts of your behaviour. A deeper layer of the human vector, stripped close to the vector field itself.
This whole notion of how far down the vector field goes is a fascinating one that requires further thought.
9) Wittgenstein and Laruelle point to the same place. This is because ‚language‘ itself is a use word. It cannot be the ‚real‘ noun that designates something. It all emanates from what can reasonably grammatically be called the one, or the human. No statement escapes. Language only speaks as language when it has been accreted, without this it is the vector region that the concept language is applied to (consider discussion two organisms communicating and asking ‚are they using language?‘). One cannot understand the world beyond the accretions from within them. The only possibility of a greater comprehension comes from the possibility of something like a different consciousness being possible. This possibility remains agnostic disjunctive, at least from the level of regular thought.
10) Regular thought exists in a band that cannot seriously conceive of the world other than as it appears: solid, continuous. Agnostic disjunction functions at this level of thought. It renders anomaly as a possibility that cannot be dismissed but cannot be established. The only way out of agnostic disjunction is by the possibility of something like Gurdjieff describes as ‚objective consciousness‘. This of course brings in the problem of ‚levels of consciousness‘ which again cannot be verified in any way other than through the circular achievement of a ‚higher‘ or ‚altered level‘.
11) Gurdjieff makes a particularly interesting statement concerning art. He divides it into objective and subjective. Subjective art is that art we create when we allow powers to flow through us. Whereas objective art is created by a consciousness that is in control of its various parts and actually deliberately creates the work. Such a work, he says, will not generate subjective impressions of interpretation but rather will impose its meaning upon us all.
The last century and indeed this one, has made much of the discovery that we are not in control of the cultural, conceptual powers (pneuminous accretions/memes) that flow through us. Art controls the artist, we are but a vessel. Our general likes/dislikes and determinations are simply a product of these cultural forces. The CEO has played with this language calling it agenthood and utilised the phrase ‚who do you work for?‘ to describe how we work for such forces —philosophers work for ontologies, they are agents for them, this explains their stubbornness of defending positions that are no better than those of enemy agents.
The occult endeavour again highlights the possibility of escape from these forces. The possibility that the ‚being-possessed‘ by these powers is a contingent condition that we can potentially escape from -though not without serious effort. The death of the author is true but the author may also exist in some circumstances.
12) The double in Castaneda is the second body in Gurdjieff. This is largely the aim of both systems. The transference of consciousness from the feeble disparate exterior to a unified and separable (from the physical body) interior. He makes a fascinating comment that the kingdom of heaven in Christianity is just the development of the second body. Only when the second body is developed is survival beyond death possible. Even this though is finite —equally fascinating as again it suggests, not an eternal beyond, but simply another negotiable realm.
13) The Moon in Gurdjieff devours our awareness, we only can stop this by the development of ‚objective consciousness‘. This is very similar to the ‚Eagle‘
14) All adornments (job, clothes, language, hair styles etc) are a semiotic system that displays ones alignment to various powers. Some are imposed, some are chosen. Liberation from these powers leaves a vacuum we must somehow fill with a curious control. If we simply remove them, more accretions will take their place. This aids flexibility but not control itself.
15) Magnetic centres are what we develop and activate when we trigger synchronicity. Our fascination with this at the wrong level easily burns the centre out. We can reactivate it, but our modern consciousness means making contact through the centre is almost impossible. We have no choice but to attempt solitary activity and experiment.
16) Gurdjieff suggests that the mystery schools were/are not complete in their questionings. He indicates they continued to conduct experiments on subjects concerning consciousness. Some products of these are fakirs that one may encounter performing incredible feats. He suggests such people are sometimes simply failed experiments of mystery schools. This suggests a very scientific attitude (that one would not get past an ethics committee) towards their relation to consciousness. Ouspensky mentions an anecdote in which a sheep was brought to full consciousness. When he asks ‚What did they do with it?‘ Gurdjieff replies ‚They ate it.‘
17) Previous CEO terminology called the human vector the ‚regional processor‘. The ’neurotic‘ or ’self accretion‘ plugged into this to make the NARP.
18) The Hyperqabalah remains and ongoing concern. It is the development of a diagrammatic system in which each path of the previous tree of life is transformed into a sephiroth (node) or the leveled up system. It is a partial product of accident. In the process of forming sigils for each regular tree of life path they were as scribed numbers 1-22 as single symbols. This meant that if this was a new based system, it was necessarily base 23, i.e. the equivalent of 10 could only be achieved after the 22 single sigils. The cultural accretive weight of 23 makes this seem highly appropriate. Much work has been done on this but the nature of the paths between the nodes still needs establishing.
Randykib
we’re totally excited having found your web page, it is really what my friend and I have been hoping for. The up to date info here on the website is truely supportive and will support my wife and kids several times a week one of kind help. From what I see website acquired a lot of knowledge about this and the other links and information really can be seen. I’m usually not on the internet very often but as we get an opportunity We always avidly hunting libraries of knowledge and stuff closely having to do with it. Always a good place to stop.